Chris SmithHal RogersKen CalvertFrank LucasRobert AderholtSusan CollinsMike SimpsonShelley Moore CapitoJoe WilsonJohn CarterMario Diaz-BalartMarsha BlackburnMike RogersMike TurnerTom ColeVirginia FoxxAdrian SmithGus BilirakisJim JordanBob LattaRob WittmanSteve ScaliseBrett GuthrieGlenn ThompsonJim RischTom McClintockAndy HarrisAustin ScottBill HuizengaChuck FleischmannMike KellyMorgan GriffithPaul GosarRick CrawfordScott DesJarlaisSteve WomackTim WalbergAndy BarrAnn WagnerDavid JoyceRandy WeberRichard HudsonRoger WilliamsScott PerryTom CottonJason Smith Corruption & Ethics AlabamaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaFloridaGeorgiaIdahoKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMichiganMissouriNebraskaNew JerseyNorth CarolinaOhioOklahomaPennsylvaniaSouth CarolinaTennesseeTexasVirginiaWest Virginia

Republicans Once Voted for a 12-Year Limit on Congress. Forty-Six on This Site Are Already Past It — by 909 Years.

The 1995 Contract with America set the line at 12 years. Four of these men were there to vote on it. Two of them are now in year 45. And five Republicans currently cosponsor a three-term cap while serving their 7th, 10th and 17th terms.

On Sunday, August 16, 2026, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear went on CBS's Face the Nation and told Ed O'Keefe what he thinks it would take to fix the federal government. Here is what he said:

"Constitutional amendment. It is time. It should outlaw partisan redistricting and enshrine part of the Voting Rights Act right there in the constitution. It should create term limits for Congress and the Supreme Court."

He is not a lonely voice, and this is not a Democratic idea. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, has pushed a 12-year cap on congressional service for years. But the last time Congress actually voted on it, it was the Republican Party's own proposal — and the number was also 12 years.

Ordinary Americans are not close to divided on this. When Pew Research Center asked in 2023, 87% favored limiting how long members of Congress can serve — 56% strongly. Only 12% were opposed. Republicans said yes at 90%. Democrats said yes at 86%.

There is almost nothing in American politics that 87% of people agree on.

So let's use their own number. Twelve years. Here is who is already past it.

The 12-year line, and the 46 people over it

In 1995, term limits were a plank in the Contract with America — the Citizen Legislature Act, which proposed capping service at 12 years: six terms in the House, two in the Senate. That is the standard Republicans wrote for themselves.

These are the Republicans with a report card on this site who have already served 12 years or more in Congress, without a break. Years and ages are as of today, August 17, 2026.

Name Years Age Seat In office since
Chris Smith 45 73 New Jersey-4 January 1981
Hal Rogers 45 88 Kentucky-5 January 1981
Ken Calvert 33 73 California-41 January 1993
Frank Lucas 32 66 Oklahoma-3 May 1994
Robert Aderholt 29 61 Alabama-4 January 1997
Susan Collins 29 73 Maine, U.S. Senate January 1997
Mike Simpson 27 75 Idaho-2 January 1999
Shelley Moore Capito 25 72 West Virginia, U.S. Senate January 2001
Joe Wilson 24 79 South Carolina-2 December 2001
John Carter 23 84 Texas-31 January 2003
Mario Diaz-Balart 23 64 Florida-26 January 2003
Marsha Blackburn 23 74 Tennessee, U.S. Senate January 2003
Mike Rogers 23 68 Alabama-3 January 2003
Mike Turner 23 66 Ohio-10 January 2003
Tom Cole 23 77 Oklahoma-4 January 2003
Virginia Foxx 21 83 North Carolina-5 January 2005
Adrian Smith 19 55 Nebraska-3 January 2007
Gus Bilirakis 19 63 Florida-12 January 2007
Jim Jordan 19 62 Ohio-4 January 2007
Bob Latta 18 70 Ohio-5 December 2007
Rob Wittman 18 67 Virginia-1 December 2007
Steve Scalise 18 60 Louisiana-1 May 2008
Brett Guthrie 17 62 Kentucky-2 January 2009
Glenn Thompson 17 67 Pennsylvania-15 January 2009
Jim Risch 17 83 Idaho, U.S. Senate January 2009
Tom McClintock 17 70 California-5 January 2009
Andy Harris 15 69 Maryland-1 January 2011
Austin Scott 15 56 Georgia-8 January 2011
Bill Huizenga 15 57 Michigan-4 January 2011
Chuck Fleischmann 15 63 Tennessee-3 January 2011
Mike Kelly 15 78 Pennsylvania-16 January 2011
Morgan Griffith 15 68 Virginia-9 January 2011
Paul Gosar 15 67 Arizona-9 January 2011
Rick Crawford 15 60 Arkansas-1 January 2011
Scott DesJarlais 15 62 Tennessee-4 January 2011
Steve Womack 15 69 Arkansas-3 January 2011
Tim Walberg 15 75 Michigan-5 January 2011
Andy Barr 13 53 Kentucky-6 January 2013
Ann Wagner 13 63 Missouri-2 January 2013
David Joyce 13 69 Ohio-14 January 2013
Randy Weber 13 73 Texas-14 January 2013
Richard Hudson 13 54 North Carolina-9 January 2013
Roger Williams 13 76 Texas-25 January 2013
Scott Perry 13 64 Pennsylvania-10 January 2013
Tom Cotton 13 49 Arkansas, U.S. Senate January 2013
Jason Smith 13 46 Missouri-8 June 2013

Forty-six people. Twenty-four states. 909 years.

Nine of them have served double the limit their own party proposed. Two of them — Hal Rogers and Chris Smith — are approaching four times it. Eighteen of the 46 are 70 or older. Four are past 80.

Two of them were sworn in before Reagan was inaugurated

Hal Rogers and Chris Smith both took office on January 5, 1981 — fifteen days before Ronald Reagan's inauguration. They have both been in the House ever since. Forty-five years.

Rogers has been there so long there is a title for it. The House's own historians keep the list: he has been Dean of the House — the longest-serving member of the entire chamber — since 2022, through three Speakers.

He is 88 years old. In November 2025 he filed for re-election again, and in May 2026 he beat four primary challengers for the nomination. If he wins in November, he starts his 24th term at 89.

Four of them were there for the vote. Two voted for the limit.

Here is the part that should end the argument.

On March 29, 1995, the House voted on the Citizen Legislature Act as a constitutional amendment. Four of the forty-six were already in Congress that day. Here is the roll call:

  • Ken Calvert — Aye. He had served two years. He has served 31 more since.
  • Frank Lucas — Aye. He had been there ten months. He has served 31 more since.
  • Hal Rogers — No.
  • Chris Smith — No.

The amendment got 227 votes to 204. A constitutional amendment needs two-thirds, so it failed.

Read that again. Calvert and Lucas voted for a rule that would have ended their own House careers after twelve years. Both are now past thirty. Rogers and Smith voted to keep the door open — and then stayed another 31 years apiece.

Nobody in that group ever needed a law to leave. They could have just left.

Five of them are cosponsoring a three-term cap right now

This is not history everyone has quietly moved on from. It is happening in this Congress.

On January 6, 2025, Rep. Ralph Norman introduced House Joint Resolution 12, a constitutional amendment with a much harsher line than 1995's: "No person who has served 3 terms as a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives." Three terms. Six years.

Five people on the list above signed their names to it. Every one of them is already past three terms:

Cosponsor Terms served Signed on
Scott Perry 7 January 6, 2025
Richard Hudson 7 January 13, 2025
Gus Bilirakis 10 March 10, 2025
Frank Lucas 17 April 8, 2025
Ann Wagner 7 August 8, 2025

Frank Lucas is cosponsoring a cap of three terms in his seventeenth.

None of them is required to quit for signing it — these amendments are written to apply going forward, and the pledge groups never ask anyone to pack up. But that is exactly the point. Putting your name on a resolution that will die in committee costs nothing. Leaving costs something. Guess which one keeps happening.

We have watched this move up close before. Alabama's Gary Palmer promised voters he'd serve five terms, then ran for a seventh and said he'd prayed about it. Pennsylvania's Guy Reschenthaler quietly stopped signing the term-limits amendment he'd backed three times — and signed again only eleven days after a billboard about it went up in his district.

Why they don't leave: eleven of thirteen gavels

None of this is an accident. Congress hands out power by seniority, and the gavels are where the money gets decided.

Look at the House Appropriations Committee, which writes the federal spending bills. It has one full-committee chair and twelve subcommittee chairs. Per the committee's current roster, eleven of those thirteen gavels belong to people on the list above:

  • Tom Cole — chairman of the full committee
  • Hal Rogers — Commerce, Justice, Science
  • Ken Calvert — Defense
  • Mike Simpson — Interior and Environment
  • Robert Aderholt — Labor, Health and Human Services, Education
  • John Carter — Military Construction and Veterans Affairs
  • Mario Diaz-Balart — National Security and State
  • Andy Harris — Agriculture and the FDA
  • Chuck Fleischmann — Energy and Water
  • David Joyce — Financial Services
  • Steve Womack — Transportation and Housing

Over in the Senate, Susan Collins chairs the Appropriations Committee too. Steve Scalise is the House Majority Leader. Jim Jordan chairs the Judiciary Committee. Virginia Foxx — 21 years in, and 83 — was handed the Rules Committee by Speaker Mike Johnson, the panel that decides which bills reach the floor and whether anyone gets to amend them.

We have already shown what those gavels buy. Rogers chaired the subcommittee controlling the entire Homeland Security budget — and a New York Times investigation found he steered a national ID-card program into a town of 8,000 in his own district while taking eleven trips, six of them to Hawaii, from a group in line to profit from a no-bid contract he arranged. Calvert campaigns on bringing home more federal money than any member in California history; the LA Times found $16 million of it landing within a few miles of rental properties he owns, including a building he had never disclosed.

Even Khanna, who wants the 12-year cap, admits out loud why this is hard. Describing the pushback he gets, he put the objection this way: "Well, look, we finally got seniority in a system where you have to wait 10 years before the voice really matters."

That is the whole trap in one sentence. The system is built so a new member has no power — and that is then used as the argument for why the old ones can never go.

The ones who won't even stand in a room

Long tenure would be easier to defend if it came with more accountability. It comes with less.

John Carter has held Texas's 31st District since 2003. His last documented in-person town hall was in 2013. When about 150 constituents held one for him in Belton in March 2025, they brought a life-size cardboard cutout to stand in for him, and his office dismissed them as "the far-left Indivisible group."

Mike Turner has held Ohio's 10th since 2003. When his opponent publicly asked him to debate and the Dayton Daily News put the question to him directly — would he debate, or hold a town hall? — he answered a different question entirely, responding with a press release about her health care plan. Not a yes. Not a no. Not one word about either.

That is what a safe seat buys you after two decades: you stop having to explain yourself.

And then there's Grassley

Iowa's Chuck Grassley doesn't have a report card here, because we track people on the 2026 ballot and he isn't on it. But he is the clearest picture of where this road ends.

Grassley has been in Congress since January 1975 — six years in the House, then the Senate ever since. That is 51 years, more than four times the limit his party once voted on. He is 92. His current term runs to January 2029, when he'll be 95.

He has already filed a statement of candidacy with the FEC for 2028. Asked in August 2025 whether he'd actually run for a ninth term, he wouldn't rule it out — his answer was "ask me the question in a couple of years."

A ninth Senate term would run to January 2035. Grassley was born on September 17, 1933. He would be 101 years old on the last day of it.

This was supposed to be a job you leave

Nobody on that list is there because of a conspiracy. They are there because they keep winning, in districts drawn to make sure they keep winning, with money that flows to incumbents because incumbents hold the gavels.

But "it's legal" and "they got elected" are answers to a question nobody asked. The question is whether a dozen years is enough — and Republicans themselves already answered it, on the record, in 1995. Twelve years. Six terms. Then go home and live under the laws you wrote.

Forty-six of them are past that line. Nine are past double it. Two are near four times it. Not one has treated their own party's number as binding on themselves.

Serving in Congress was supposed to be something you do for a while, as your part of the deal, and then hand off. A civic duty with an end date. Not a career, not a pension plan, and not a chair you sit in until you are 101.

Eighty-seven percent of Americans already agree. So does a Democratic governor in Kentucky, a Democratic congressman from Silicon Valley, and — in writing, twice, thirty years apart — the Republican Party itself.

They don't need a constitutional amendment to do the right thing. They could just go home.

Sources

Years of service, term counts and ages are calculated from the public congress-legislators dataset, compiled from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress and the official House and Senate rosters. "Years" counts continuous service, so a member who left and later returned is credited only from their return.