Brad Little Checks & BalancesMilitary Idaho

Brad Little Sent Idaho National Guard Troops to Washington in February and Didn't Announce It. Seven Months Later, Nobody Will Say What It Costs.

Idaho guardsmen have been policing Washington, D.C. since February under Trump's executive order. The ACLU wants them home. The Pentagon says it won't know the cost until the mission ends. And a D.C. resident has filed a $3 million claim saying Idaho guardsmen injured her.

MAGA Report Cards ·
Share: X Facebook Bluesky Reddit Email
Brad Little Sent Idaho National Guard Troops to Washington in February and Didn't Announce It. Seven Months Later, Nobody Will Say What It Costs.

Idaho National Guard soldiers have been deployed to Washington, D.C. since February 2026, carrying out President Trump's executive order titled "Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful."

Idaho officials did not announce the deployment when it started. The Idaho Capital Sun found it later.

Seven months on, three things about it are still true: nobody in the federal government will say what it costs, a Washington resident has filed a $3 million claim saying Idaho guardsmen injured her, and Brad Little has the authority to end it and won't.

Nobody will say what it costs

The Idaho Capital Sun asked the obvious question and got passed around.

The Joint Task Force running the mission said to ask the Office of the Secretary of Defense. The Office of the Secretary of Defense said to ask the Joint Task Force. Asked a second time, the Secretary of Defense's office said this:

"We will not know the cost until the mission is completed."

That is not a budget answer. That is a refusal dressed as one. An operation seven months old has been costing money for seven months; this one apparently has a number that arrives only after there is nothing anyone can do about it.

The deployment is federally funded, which is the standard reply when anyone asks Idaho about the money. It does not answer the question of what Idaho gives up while its soldiers are on the other side of the country.

What Idaho gives up

The ACLU of Idaho put that part to the governor in a press release last Thursday. Executive Director Leo Morales:

"There is no real emergency justifying the need to send troops to the other side of the country. This deployment of National Guard members in D.C. for many months has pulled taxpayer-funded resources away from true, critical emergencies here in Idaho, including wildfires. Additionally, the lack of transparency around this deployment and the recent incident involving a D.C. veteran and Idaho National Guard members should concern all Idahoans. Governor Little has the power to put this to an end."

That last sentence is the one that matters. This is not something happening to Idaho. Governors sent these troops — Idaho's included — and a governor can bring them home.

The incident

In July, attorneys with the ACLU of D.C. filed a $3 million legal claim against the Idaho National Guard on behalf of a Washington resident who says Idaho guardsmen injured her outside her own home in May.

That is a claim, not a verdict, and it has not been tested in court. But it is the kind of thing that happens when soldiers from one state are used as police in another, and it is now attached to Idaho's name.

The numbers keep moving and nobody explains why

As of September 1, 2026, there were 24 Idaho guardsmen in Washington, part of 3,780 Guard personnel drawn from around the country, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

In late July there were 99.

So the deployment shrank by three-quarters in about five weeks, with no public explanation of why it was 99, why it is now 24, or what determines the number. Asked about it, the Idaho National Guard's spokesman, Lt. Col. Chris Borders, said the troops "continue to support" the mission "while maintaining the readiness to respond to emergencies and other missions in Idaho," and that "any future participation in JTF-DC will be based on mission requirements and direction from the appropriate authorities." He did not address the numbers.

Little's answer

Little's office answered with an emailed statement from communication director Emily Callihan — the same sentence, word for word, that it gave the Sun five weeks earlier when the deployment first came to light:

"Governor Little is proud of Idaho's citizen-soldiers and the professionalism, dedication, and service they bring to every mission, including Operation Safe and Beautiful."

Read it again. It praises the soldiers. It says nothing about the mission, the cost, the seven months, the injury claim, or why Idahoans weren't told in February.

Praising the troops is not the same as answering for the order that sent them. Little is not quoted in the story at all — his communication director is — and he is the one person who could reverse it.

This is a governor who has been comfortable making confident public statements about Idaho's safety and about the state's finances while the numbers underneath were doing something else.

What we know

Brad Little sent Idaho National Guard soldiers to police Washington, D.C. in February 2026 without announcing it, under a Trump executive order. Seven months later the Pentagon says it won't know the cost until the mission ends, the troop count has gone from 99 to 24 with no explanation, and a Washington resident has filed a $3 million claim alleging Idaho guardsmen injured her outside her home. Asked to bring them back, Little's office said he is proud of them.

Sources

Take Action →
Brad Little Report Card

Related articles