JobsLies

Trump Promised to Be 'the Greatest Jobs President That God Ever Created.' He Left Office With 2.8 Million Fewer American Jobs Than When He Walked In.

Eighty years of federal jobs data, charted. The three best job-creating presidents since World War II are all Democrats. The five worst are all Republicans. And when the numbers went bad last year, Trump fired the person who counts them.

MAGA Report Cards ·
Share: X Facebook Bluesky Reddit Email
Trump Promised to Be 'the Greatest Jobs President That God Ever Created.' He Left Office With 2.8 Million Fewer American Jobs Than When He Walked In.

On Friday, August 7, the government released the July jobs report. The country did not add jobs that month. It lost 23,000 of them.

One bad month proves nothing. Any economy has bad months. But the government has counted American jobs every single month since 1939. Line up eight decades of that counting and sort it by who was sitting in the White House, and you get a pattern so lopsided it is hard to look at.

That is the chart above. Every president since World War II, and the average number of jobs the country added each month they were in office.

The three best are Democrats. The five worst are all Republicans.

Here is how the ranking comes out, using the government's own payroll numbers:

  • Biden — 321,000 jobs a month
  • Clinton — 239,000 a month
  • Carter — 215,000 a month
  • Reagan — 168,000 a month
  • Kennedy/Johnson — 164,000 a month

And the bottom of the list:

  • G.H.W. Bush — 55,000 a month
  • Eisenhower — 37,000 a month
  • Trump, so far this term — 33,000 a month
  • G.W. Bush — 14,000 a month
  • Trump, first term — losing 58,000 a month

The top three are all Democrats. The bottom five are all Republicans.

And that last line is not a typo. Donald Trump left office in January 2021 with 2.8 million fewer American jobs than when he walked in. He is the only president since 1945 to manage that. The Senate's Joint Economic Committee called him "the first president in the modern era to oversee net job losses."

Six years earlier, standing in the lobby of Trump Tower to announce he was running, he had promised something else. "I will be the greatest jobs president that God ever created," he said.

Since 1989, it is not even close

Narrow the window to the last 37 years and the gap stops being a gap and starts being a canyon.

Bar chart: of the 51.7 million jobs the United States added between January 1989 and July 2026, 49.9 million came under Democratic presidents and 1.8 million under Republican presidents.

Since January 1989, America has added about 51.7 million jobs. 49.9 million of them — 96.5% — came while a Democrat was president. Republicans held the White House for 17 and a half of those years and produced 1.8 million.

This is not a talking point somebody made up. PolitiFact checked a version of it in 2024 and rated it Mostly True, putting the figure at 97.4% at the time. Every number in this article comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the same agency whose numbers get quoted on Fox Business every month.

The honest part

We are not going to pretend this proves more than it proves.

Presidents do not personally hand out jobs. They inherit an economy, and a lot of what happens to it is luck. Two Princeton economists, Alan Blinder and Mark Watson, studied this exact question and found the Democratic advantage is real and big enough that chance does not explain it. But they also concluded it comes mostly from better luck: gentler oil shocks, faster productivity growth, and a friendlier world economy — not from Democrats being wizards. They specifically ruled out Democrats simply spending more. Obama's number looks middling because he walked into the worst crash since the Depression. Trump's first-term number is as bad as it is because of COVID.

So no, the pattern is not a law of physics, and it is not literally true that every Democrat beat every Republican. Reagan beat three of the six Democrats on the chart.

But here is the thing. Republicans do not get to have it both ways.

They claim credit for good numbers every single time. When the numbers are bad, suddenly the president does not control the economy. You cannot spend forty years campaigning as the party of jobs and the party of business, hold the White House for nearly half that time, deliver 3.5% of the country's job growth, and then turn around and explain that presidents do not really affect jobs. Pick one.

The pattern also is not limited to Washington. We looked at the ten lowest-paying states in America — nine of the ten are run top to bottom by Republicans.

What is happening right now

Trump has been back in office for 18 months. In that time the country has added 590,000 jobs. That works out to about 33,000 a month.

Biden's last 18 months produced 2.2 million — almost four times as many.

Some of that was on purpose. The federal government has shed 327,000 jobs since January 2025 — a 10.9% cut — while Elon Musk's DOGE tore through the agencies. DOGE's charter quietly expired on July 4 with no final report. The job losses did not expire with it. Those were real people with real paychecks.

And the jobs that were supposed to come roaring back have not. Manufacturing employment is down 62,000 since Trump took office — the sector the tariffs were sold to save. When a Republican tells you the tariffs brought the factory jobs home, check it. Mike Bost told a crowd tariffs put "all 3,000 of those people" back to work at the Granite City steel mill. His own press release said 500.

Meanwhile paychecks are barely moving. Average hourly pay for private workers rose 3.2% over the past year — the slowest that figure has been since May 2021.

When the numbers went bad, he fired the woman who counts them

On August 1, 2025, the BLS reported the country had added just 73,000 jobs in July, and revised the two months before it down by a combined 258,000 — the biggest two-month downward revision since the start of COVID.

Trump fired the head of the agency that same day.

"I was just informed that our Country's 'Jobs Numbers' are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory."

He offered no evidence. Revisions are routine — they run in both directions, under every president, because employers file their paperwork late. This one was unusually large. It was not evidence of a fix.

The sharpest response came from William Beach — the man Trump himself appointed to run the BLS in 2017, and McEntarfer's immediate predecessor.

"The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau."

Beach added, in a separate statement:

"This escalates the President's unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news."

Trump then tried to install E.J. Antoni, an economist from the Heritage Foundation, in the job. That nomination was withdrawn at the end of September 2025. Trump's own budget had already proposed cutting the bureau's staff by 8% — shrinking the agency that produces the numbers he says are wrong.

That is the tell. If the jobs numbers were fine, you would not need to fire the statistician.

Why this matters to you

Eighty years is a long time to run an experiment. The country has tried it both ways, over and over, through wars and oil shocks and crashes and booms. The scoreboard is public, it is updated the first Friday of every month, and it does not care who you voted for.

It is the same story as the debt. Republicans campaign as the party of fiscal responsibility, and the national debt just passed $40 trillion, with $3.8 trillion of it added in the last 19 months alone.

The branding says one thing. The numbers say another. Believe the numbers — and when someone starts attacking the people who publish them, ask yourself why.

Sources

Related articles