Mariannette Miller-Meeks HealthcareCost of Living Iowa

Mariannette Miller-Meeks Says Nobody Has Complained to Her About Higher Health Costs. Iowa's Marketplace Premiums Went Up 15.3% This Year.

Accepting the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's endorsement at an Indianola factory, Miller-Meeks told the workers she voted for Trump's budget bill 'not for business organizations or owners' but 'for you all' — then said she hasn't heard from a single Iowan hurt by it.

Mariannette Miller-Meeks Says Nobody Has Complained to Her About Higher Health Costs. Iowa's Marketplace Premiums Went Up 15.3% This Year.

On Friday, August 28, 2026, Mariannette Miller-Meeks stood on the floor of Cemen Tech in Indianola, accepted the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's endorsement, and told the assembled employees why she voted for Trump's 2025 budget bill.

Not for the business groups, she said. Not for the owners.

"It was for you, who make this country great, who keep this country moving forward, who allow us to keep globally economic (power)."

She said this while flanked by the Midwest regional manager of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the vice president of public policy for the Iowa Association of Business and Industry, who were there to endorse her.

The business organizations were not upset about the framing. They were the ones holding the event.

Then there were the health costs

Miller-Meeks said she had not heard from Iowa businesses or workers facing higher health care costs and premiums — from the budget bill itself or from the expiration of the Affordable Care Act tax credits.

What she said, as reported by the Iowa Capital Dispatch:

"First and foremost, I hadn't had any business coming and complaining to me. The majority of Americans, over 130 million Americans, are on employer-based health insurance. And extending the expanded COVID-era tax credits, which went directly to profitable insurance companies, did nothing to lower the premiums for the individuals here, or for these businesses who provide those benefits."

Here is the number she did not mention. After those federal subsidies expired, insurers raised premiums for Iowa's ACA-marketplace customers by an average of 15.3% for 2026.

Not a projection. The rates Iowans are paying now.

Miller-Meeks is a physician. She knows the difference between "nobody has complained to me" and "nobody is being harmed." The first is a statement about who gets access to her. The second is a claim about Iowa, and it is not true.

She also knows why nobody at a Chamber of Commerce endorsement event was complaining about the individual marketplace: the people on it are not in that room. They are self-employed, they work for small businesses that don't offer coverage, they're between jobs, they're farming. Her "over 130 million Americans are on employer-based insurance" answer is a way of saying the Iowans who lost the subsidy are a minority — which is true, and is not a defense.

This was not one state's bad luck. House Republicans voted 216–211 for a health bill whose text never mentions the expiring tax credits, and Miller-Meeks was one of the 216.

The rural hospital fund she is touting exists because of the bill she voted for

Miller-Meeks pointed to two things she is doing on health care: a bill she calls the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act, and money she has secured for rural hospitals through the federal Rural Health Transformation Program.

That second one deserves a closer look, because the Iowa Capital Dispatch described exactly what the program is: it "was created to help offset the projected decline in rural Medicaid spending due to changes made through the OBBBA."

In other words, the fund exists because the budget bill cut rural Medicaid. Miller-Meeks voted for the cut, and is now campaigning on the patch.

We covered what the cut has already done in her district. A year after her vote, nearly 25,000 fewer Iowans were on food assistance, her district's hospital had stopped delivering babies, and she had told a booing town hall crowd that her committee voted "to strengthen and preserve Medicaid".

That was in July. The answer in August is that nobody has complained.

What the endorsement is actually for

The Chamber's Micah Olson explained why the group is backing her. She has "aligned U.S. Chamber priorities on issues like pro-growth tax policy, eliminating burdensome regulations, streamlining our federal permitting process, and investing in America's workforce and infrastructure."

That is a fair and accurate description of her record, offered by the people whose priorities she aligned with. It is also the exact opposite of what she told the workers at Cemen Tech at the same event — that the vote was "not for business organizations or owners."

Both things were said in the same room, at the same event, to the same audience.

The Chamber also endorsed Iowa's Zach Nunn earlier in August. Both districts are among the most competitive in the country this November, and Miller-Meeks faces Christina Bohannan for the third straight cycle. Bohannan's response to the event: "Rep. Miller-Meeks has been bad for business in Iowa, and it's affected everyone: small businesses, workers, and families."

What the record shows

Mariannette Miller-Meeks voted for a budget law that cut rural Medicaid and let the ACA tax credits lapse. Iowa's marketplace insurers then raised premiums an average of 15.3% for 2026. Asked about it at a U.S. Chamber of Commerce endorsement event on August 28, she said no business had come to complain to her, and told the workers in the room she had cast that vote "not for business organizations or owners" but for them — with the business organizations standing beside her, endorsing her for it.

Source

Robin Opsahl, U.S. Rep. Miller-Meeks says 2025 GOP tax cuts help Iowa manufacturing workers, Iowa Capital Dispatch, August 28, 2026. Photo: Robin Opsahl / Iowa Capital Dispatch.

Mariannette Miller-Meeks Report Card